Next: 6 The Context of
Up: 5 Relationships between Variables
Previous: 2 Analyzing Direction of
  Index
3 Analyzing Developmental Change
Any cross-sectional study is a slice at one time point
across the continuing ontogenetic dialogue between the organism
and the environment. While such studies help us understand
outcomes, they may not tell us much about the process of
``becoming''. For example, the longitudinal genetic study involving repeated measures
of twins may be thought of as a multivariate
genetic study in which the multiple occasions of measurement
correspond to multiple traits in the conventional cross-sectional
study. In the conventional multivariate study we ask such
questions as ``How much do genes create the correlation between
different variables?'', so in the longitudinal genetic study we
ask ``How far do genes (or environment) account for the
developmental consistency of behavior?'' and ``To what extent are there
specific genetic and environmental effects expressed at each
point in time?''. These are but two of a rich variety of
questions which can be addressed with the methods
we shall describe. One indication of the insight that can ensue
from such an approach to longitudinal measures on twins comes from some
of the data on cognitive growth obtained in the ground-breaking
Louisville Twin Study. In a reanalysis by
model fitting methods, Eaves et al. (1986) concluded
that such
data as had been published strongly suggested the involvement of
a single common set of genes which were active from birth to
adolescence and whose affects persisted and accumulated through time.
By contrast, the shared environment kept changing during
development. That is, parents who provided a better environment
at one age did not necessarily do so at another, even though
whatever they did had fairly persistent effects. The unique
environment of the individual, however, was age-specific and very
ephemeral in its effect. Such a model, based as it was on only
that part of the data available in print, may not stand the test
of more detailed scrutiny. Our aim here is not so much to defend a particular
model for cognitive development as to indicate that a model fitting approach
to longitudinal kinship data can lead to many important insights about the
developmental process.
Next: 6 The Context of
Up: 5 Relationships between Variables
Previous: 2 Analyzing Direction of
  Index
Jeff Lessem
2002-03-21