Psyc 3102: Behavioral Genetics (Carey)
Fall 2004: Questions for the Final Exam
Procedure: Below are a series of questions that may appear on the final exam. You may prepare for these in any way you choose—study with friends, see the professor, etc. Excluding definitions, about 5 or 6 of these will appear verbatim on the final exam. You will have to answer all of these 5 or 6 questions without the benefit of open books or notes during the final exam period.
1) set point model of personality stability and change
8) naturalistic fallacy
9) smorgasbord model of personality development
10) set point model of personality
1) Name and define the five forces of human evolution.
2) Consider the following statement: "The
3) Here is a complicated statement: "Empirical evidence suggests that being raised in the same family does not make siblings similar to one another in personality. However, these same data cannot be used to say that parents have no influence on their children's behavior." Give a lucid and common sense explanation of this statement to a layperson who is educated but does not have much training in psychology. Make certain to include the types of empirical data on which the above statement rests.
The following is a quote from a behavioral geneticist: “If a strong meritocracy evolves in this
5) Describe the relationship among genes, intelligence (as measured by intelligence tests), and social stratification in modern industrialized society.
6) The phenomenon of personal ornamentation (i.e., fashion in clothes, hair, jewelry, tattoos, etc.) is found in every human culture. As is readily apparent to anyone who watches National Geographic and old movies, ornamentation varies tremendously from one culture to another and also changes over time within a single culture. There are also marked individual differences in ornamentation within a culture. To my knowledge, no one has ever done a twin or adoption study of ornamentation, but the results would probably show a moderate degree of heritability.
Using your knowledge of both evolutionary psychology and the genetics of individual differences in behavior, write a lucid and coherent theoretical account of how genes might relate to personal ornamentation.
7) An asteroid strikes earth and results in the extinction
of all human populations except for two--a group of native South American
Indians living in the
a.) Genetically, how similar and how different would these two populations be?
b.) On what phenotypic traits are they likely to differ the most?
c.) On what phenotypic traits are they likely to be most similar?
d.) Give reasons for your answers to the above three questions.
8) Describe the role that culture has played in human evolution and give two specific examples of how culture has (probably) influenced the evolution of our species.
9) Give four different generalizations from the empirical data on the genetics of personality.
10) The following is a quote from Stephen Jay Gould in a critique on The Bell Curve. "The general claim is neither uninteresting nor illogical, but it does require the validity of four shaky premises, all asserted (but hardly discussed or defended) by Herrnstein and Murray. Intelligence, in their formulation, must be depictable by a single number, capable of ranking people in linear order, genetically based, and effectively immutable. If any of these premises are false, their entire argument collapses." Stephen Jay Gould, "Curveball," The New Yorker, November 28, 1994.
In class, we did not discuss the issues of representing IQ by a single number and linearly ordering people by this, so it is not necessary for you to treat these issues. Otherwise answer the questions below about this quote:
a) What does the empirical evidence suggest about intelligence being "genetically based"?
b) How necessary is the “genetically based” assumption for Herrnstein and Murray?
c) What does the empirical evidence suggest about intelligence being "effectively immutable"?
d) Gould later goes on to say that because of the failures of these assumptions, intelligence (as measured by IQ tests) plays no role in eventual social status. Criticize this conclusion.
11) Describe the Flynn effect, what is known about it, what is not known about it, and the implications of the Flynn effect for group differences in intelligence.
12) The following is an actual statement made to your professor by a very high ranking person in the Department of Justice—“If crime is genetic, then the implications for the penal system and the concept of rehabilitation are enormous.” Using your knowledge of the major conclusions to this course and of the concepts of heritability and environmentability, compose a lucid response to this statement.
13) Describe how the study of an endophenotype can help us learn more about the genetics of psychopathology.
14) Parental investment theory has been used by a number of evolutionary psychologists to explain differences in sexual behavior between men and women. The theory states that the parent that invests the more time and energy in conceiving and raising offspring will be the choosier mate. In terms of the physical capabilities for procreation, a human male has the potential to father hundreds of children. A human female, being limited by nine months of pregnancy and many more months of nursing, can never physically have as many potential offspring as a male. Hence, the argument goes, human females are likely to be much “chooiser” of a sex partner than human males.
Like many behaviors, however, technology and culture can change the “biological rules” that evolved for millennia before that technology came on the scene. With modern methods of contraception, the probability of an unplanned pregnancy is reduced and hence, both men and women can engage in sex without the risk of “parental investment” that happened in the past. Write two paragraphs on how modern contraception may or may not impact parental investment theory and the issue of which gender will be “choosier” in terms of sex partners.
15) Here are some examples of a quantitative problem that you might get. (NOTE WELL: The numbers and/or relationships could change if this question is given in the final).
15.a) As part of your honor’s thesis at CU, you analyze data on juvenile delinquency in young adolescent twins. The correlation for MZ twins is .62 and the correlation for DZ twins is .47. Write a brief paragraph in the discussion section of your honor’s thesis giving a synopsis of these results.
15.b) You great-grandmother writes a note to you asking what you are learning in school. You have just helped your professor analyze data on the amount of time that children watch TV during the week. The correlation for adoptive siblings is .04 and the correlation for biological siblings raised in the same household is .26. Write back to your great-grandmother describing these results. MAKE CERTAIN THAT YOU DO NOT USE ANY TECHNICAL JARGON LIKE THE WORDS “CORRELATIO,” “HERITABILITY,” AND “ENVIRONMENTABILITY.”
16) In a paragraph, describe the overall results of molecular genetics and psychopathology. Mention the potential reason(s) for these findings and the prospects for the future.
17) What are “idiosyncratic parental effects?” What role might they play in the estimation of “common environmental effects” on personality? What is empirically known about these effects?
18) The biggest “genetic marker” for alcoholism is the Y chromosome. Give a plausible scenario of how the Y might have achieved this status.
19) The biggest “genetic marker” for anxiety disorders is the absence of the Y chromosome. Give a plausible scenario of how the XX genotype achieved this status.