INTRODUCTION TO BEHAVIORAL
GENETICS
PSYCH 3102 Dr Hewitt
HOMEWORK #4 ANSWER KEY
1. Type of relative
Expected
correlation
Numerical value
in terms of h2
if h2 = 0.6
MZ
twins
h2
0.6
DZ twins ½ h2 0.3
Parent w. adopted child 0 0
Parent w. biological child ½ h2 0.30
Adoptive siblings 0 0
Biological full
sibs
½ h2 0.3
Biological half sibs ¼ h2 0.15
Cousins 1/8h2 0.075
2. TRAIT
HT
IQ
N EXT
i.Is the trait influenced
by genes? yes
to all
Reasons:- in each case, MZ correlation > DZ correlation
ii.Is there evidence of
shared no yes no no
family environmental effects?
Reasons:- only for IQ does DZ correlation exceed ½ MZ correlation
iii.Is there any evidence for
non-additive genetic effects? no
no no yes
Reasons:- only
for EXT is the DZ correlation less than ½ the MZ correlation
iv.Does the non-shared environment
account for more than 10% of variance? no yes
yes yes
Reasons:- only
for HT does the MZ correlation exceed 0.9
3. Heritability for this trait is 0
Because no variation in the phenotype is due to genes in this population
4. a, False – heritability is NOT the proportion of a phenotype that is passed on – phenotype is never passed on, only genes are. Whilst roughly 50% of alleles are passed on to each offspring by each parent, we never know exactly which alleles. The actual 50% is unique to each offspring.
b. False – high
heritability does NOT mean genetic determinism. Whilst a high heritability
implies most variation for the trait comes from genes not environment and also
that the phenotype of the person is a good reflection of their genotype, the
environment can (and does) change or can be manipulated so that phenotype is
changed
examples of this : the change in IQ, height over time – mean levels of both have been rising over time, heritability for both remains high
c. False – heritability
estimated from one group can NOT be used to imply anything about a second group
– each heritability that is calculated refers to the
group from which the data was drawn. Heritabilites
may vary across groups, as might mean level of trait – but we cannot say
anything about the causes of those group differences. The environment might
differ between the groups, for example, and this may be the cause of the
differences.
d. False – a large
heritability does NOT imply genes of large effect. We can say that genetic
variation is important in determining level of trait but this could come about
through the action of a small number of genes of large effect each, or from a
large number of genes each with very small effect.
5. you can work the c2on the allele frequencies or the genotype frequencies but you have to take into account the facts that genotype (allele) frequencies and sample sizes are all different . You would use a null hypothesis of NO Association and calculate the expected on the basis that each class will have a frequency that reflects sample size and genotype frequency ONLY ie there is NO effect of genotype on case versus control.
Obs DAT1
genotype
9/9 9/10 10/10
Controls 9 55 98 /162
Cases 10 71 129 /210
19 126 227 Total
= 372
Exp Controls 19x162 126x162 227x162
372
372 372
Cases 19x210 126x210 227x210
372
372 372
Obs Exp (Obs-Exp)2/Exp
9 8.17 0.084
10 10.64 0.038
55 54.08 0.016
71 70.56 0.003
98 98.85 0.007
129 127.12 0.028
e =
0.176 5df Prob > 100%
There is NO association