Twin correlations may be derived in a number of different ways, but
the most direct method is to list all possible twin-pair genotypes
(taken as deviations from the population mean) and
the frequency with which they arise in a random-mating population.
Then, the expected covariance may be obtained by multiplying the
genotypic effects for each pair, weighting them by the frequency of
occurrence, and summing across all possible pairs. By this method the
covariance among pairs is calculated directly. The overall mean for
such pairs is, of course, simply the population mean, ,
in the case of equal gene frequencies, as shown in the previous
section. There are shorter
methods for obtaining the same result, but these are less direct and
less intuitively obvious.
The covariance calculations are laid out in Table 3.2 for MZ,
DZ, and Unrelated pairs of siblings, the latter being included in
order to demonstrate the expected zero covariance for genetically
unrelated individuals. The nine possible combinations of genotypes
are shown in column 1, with their genotypic effects, and
, in columns 2 and 3. From these values the mean of all
pairs, , is subtracted in columns 4 and 5. Column 6
shows the products of these mean deviations. The final three columns
show the frequency with which each of the genotype pairs occurs for
the three kinds of relationship. For MZ twins, the genotypes must be
identical, so there are only three possibilities and these occur with
the population frequency of each of the possible genotypes. For
unrelated pairs, the population frequencies of the three genotypes are
simply multiplied within each pair of siblings since genotypes are
paired at random. The frequencies for DZ twins, which are the same as
for ordinary siblings, are more difficult to obtain. All possible
parental types and the proportion of paired genotypes they can produce
must be enumerated, and these categories collected up across all
possible parental types. These frequencies and the method by which
they are obtained may be found in standard texts (e.g., Crow and
Kimura, 1970, pp. 136-137; Falconer, 1960, pp.
152-157; Mather and Jinks,
1971, pp. 214-215).
Table 3.2:
Genetic covariance components for MZ, DZ, and
Unrelated siblings with equal gene frequencies at a single locus
(
).
Genotype
Effect
Frequency
Pair
MZ
DZ
U
-
-
-
-
-
-
in all
cases; genetic covariance =
The products in column 6, weighted by the frequencies for the three
sibling types, yield the degree of genetic resemblance between
siblings. In the case of MZ twins, the covariance equals
(11)
which is simply expression 3.2, the total genetic variance in the
population. If we sum over loci, as we did in expression 3.4,
we obtain , the additive and dominance variance, as we would
intuitively expect since identical twins share all genetic
variance. The calculation for DZ twins, with terms in , ,
and initially separated for convenience, and collected together
at the end, is
(12)
When summed over all loci, this expression gives
.
The calculation for unrelated pairs of individuals yields a zero value
as expected, since, on average, unrelated siblings have no genetic
variation in common at all:
(13)
It is the fixed coefficients in front of and , 1.0 and 1.0
in the case of MZ twins and and ,
respectively, for DZ twins that
allow us to specify the Mx model and estimate and , as
will be explained in subsequent chapters. These
coefficients are the correlations between additive and dominance
deviations for the specified twin types. This may be seen easily in
the case where we assume that dominance is absent. Then, MZ and DZ genetic
covariances are simply and
, respectively.
The variance of
twin 1 and twin 2 in each case, however, is the population variance,
. For example, the DZ genetic correlation is derived as