Next: 3 Fitting Genetic Models
Up: 2 Fitting Genetic Models
Previous: 8 Incorporating Data from
  Index
9 Conclusions: Genetic Analyses of BMI Data
The analyses of Australian BMI data which we have presented indicate a
significant and substantial contribution of genetic factors to
variation in BMI, consistent with other twin studies referred to at
the beginning of Section 6.2.2. In the young cohort
like-sex pairs, we find significant evidence for genetic dominance (or
other genetic non-additivity), in addition to additive genetic effects,
but in the older cohort non-additive genetic effects are
non-significant. Further analyses are needed to determine whether
genetic and environmental parameters are significantly different
across cohorts, or indeed between males and females (see
Chapter 9).
We have discovered unexpected mean differences between zygosity groups
(in the young cohort), and between twins whose cotwin refused to
participate in the 1981 survey, and twins from concordant-participant
pairs. It is possible that these differences reflect only outlier
effects caused by a handful of observations. In this case, if we
recode BMI as an ordinal variable, we might expect to find no
significant differences in the proportions of twins falling into each
category. Alternatively, it is possible that there is an overall
shift in the distribution of BMI, in which case we must be concerned
about the undersampling of obese individuals. If the latter finding
were confirmed, further work would be needed to explore the degree to
which genetic and environmental parameters might be biased (cf. Lykken
et al., 1987; Neale et al., 1989a; Neale
and Eaves, 1992).
Next: 3 Fitting Genetic Models
Up: 2 Fitting Genetic Models
Previous: 8 Incorporating Data from
  Index
Jeff Lessem
2002-03-21