| COMPONENTS: 
 Component II: Familial Aggregation of Antisocial Substance Dependence
 
 Antisocial behavior and substance use disorders develop and change over 
        time. In order to better understand the influences on these vulnerabilites, 
        component II is a follow-up assessment of families of adolescents formerly 
        in treatment for substance dependence and conduct disorder, and community 
        control adolescents and their families (matched for gender, age, ethnicity 
        and residential location).
 
 Principal Investigator: Michael 
        C. Stallings
 Co-Investigator: Robin 
        P. Corley, Soo Rhee
 
 During the first five years of the center, beginning 
        in 1997, we accomplished the following highlights for Component II:
 
        Recruited and obtained core assessments and DNA samples from 259 treatment 
          families and 115 control families (1447 individuals); expects to complete 
          273 treatment families and 200 control families (approximately 1850 
          individuals) by the end of the first 5-year funding cycle.Established that the community control sample is representative of 
          other population-based samples; these data (in conjunction with Component 
          III and Component IV community samples) have been used to operationalize 
          age- and sex- norms for our primary variables.Developed methodology for combining clinical and control families 
          in joint family pedigree analyses that provide a powerful analytical 
          design for understanding familial and genetic influences on SUD and 
          comorbid psychopathology; the methods have been extended to make use 
          of non-normal psychiatric symptom counts.Demonstrated substantial familial aggregation for SUD and comorbid 
          psychiatric disorders; family influences transmitted from parents to 
          children (including heritable influences) account for a substantial 
          proportion of the observed familial resemblance; comorbidity is due 
          in large part to common familial influences (i.e., generalized risk).Demonstrated that marital assortment for SUD and antisocial behavior 
          is substantial and should be considered when evaluating parent-offspring 
          and sibling resemblance.   |